What does this research mean for the field?

The participation of a statistician as an author improves the reporting quality of meta-analyses in the anesthesia literature. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.SYNTHESIS. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

January 1, 2017Korean journal of anesthesiologyOpen Access

Reporting and methodologic evaluation of meta-analyses published in the anesthesia literature according to AMSTAR and PRISMA checklists: a preliminary study

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Population

Meta-analyses and systematic reviews published in the anesthesia literature between Jan. 01, 2004 and Nov…

Design

Other

Authors

JOJae Hoon Oh WSWoo Jong Shin SPSuin Park

Discussion

Member takes

Overview

Statistician co-authorship may strengthen meta-analysis reliability for anesthesia decisions; extends evidence on key reporting-quality determinants.

Structured PICO

Population

Meta-analyses and systematic reviews published in the anesthesia literature between Jan. 01, 2004 and Nov. 31, 2016

Intervention

Evaluation according to the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines

Outcome

Methodological and reporting quality of meta-analyses

The inclusion of a statistician as an author significantly improves the reporting quality of meta-analyses in the anesthesia literature.

Cite This Study

Oh et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bd0821567d2fc4d5f0fcb https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2017.70.4.446

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

January 1, 2017Korean journal of anesthesiologyOpen Access

Reporting and methodologic evaluation of meta-analyses published in the anesthesia literature according to AMSTAR and PRISMA checklists: a preliminary study

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Population

Meta-analyses and systematic reviews published in the anesthesia literature between Jan. 01, 2004 and Nov…

Design

Other

Authors

JOJae Hoon Oh WSWoo Jong Shin SPSuin Park

Discussion

Member takes

Overview

Statistician co-authorship may strengthen meta-analysis reliability for anesthesia decisions; extends evidence on key reporting-quality determinants.

Structured PICO

Population

Meta-analyses and systematic reviews published in the anesthesia literature between Jan. 01, 2004 and Nov. 31, 2016

Intervention

Evaluation according to the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines

Outcome

Methodological and reporting quality of meta-analyses

The inclusion of a statistician as an author significantly improves the reporting quality of meta-analyses in the anesthesia literature.

Cite This Study

Oh et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bd0821567d2fc4d5f0fcb https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2017.70.4.446

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark