Demonstrates the efficiency of DQFEM in estimating post-buckling behavior in frame structures with non-prismatic elements, indicating practical applicability.
Most engineering activities place significant reliance on structure weight. Engineers consistently endeavor to utilize material economically. Less structure weight directly correlates with a lower implementation price. The utilization of non-prismatic elements is one procedure for reducing building weight, particularly prominent in industrial structures. Buckling and the behavior of beam-columns under axial loads represent major factors in these structures. Consequently, accurately estimating the post-buckling behavior in beam-columns and understanding the impact of axial load are crucial. Given that the number of factors and graphs is typically extensive for columns with constant cross-sections, and they fail to cover structures with variable cross-sections, a simplified method for calculating moments and displacements must be applied. The method employed in this thesis is the Differential Quadrature Finite Element Method (DQFEM). DQFEM is a numerical technique to solve the problem where analytical solutions are difficult for beam-columns with variable cross-sections. This paper develops DQFEM for the second-order analysis of frames incorporating non-prismatic beam-columns. DQFEM represents a combination of the Differential Quadrature Method (DQM) and the Finite Element Method (FEM). Algebraic operations compute DQFE materials greatly simplifying the construction of higher-order finite elements. Comparing the obtained results with literature available demonstrates the high accuracy of the present method, achieved using a small number of finite elements and DQM sample points. The method's efficiency and practical application are worked out via numerical examples of significant practical interest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berenjani et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: