PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 31, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Contemporary methods in medical anthropology to explore serious illness-associated suffering

View Full Paper
JHJoni HaikonenAKAllan KährikPPPiret Paal

Key Points

  • This article aims to examine contemporary methodologies in medical anthropology for understanding illness-associated suffering.
  • Conducted a literature review on medical anthropology methods
  • Focused on first-person perspectives and socio-cultural influences
  • Addressed multimodal approaches to studying suffering
  • Identified diverse methodologies to investigate illness-associated suffering
  • Highlighted the complexity of illness, personhood, and suffering
  • Suggested future research directions to encompass the entirety of personhood and relational aspects in understanding suffering

Abstract

Introduction: Serious illness is a condition that carries a high risk of mortality, negatively impacts quality of life and daily function, and/or is burdensome in symptoms, treatments, or caregiver stress. This in turn can bring about multifarious forms of suffering, ranging from difficult physical symptoms and painful treatments to changing social relations and existential/spiritual distress. Medical anthropology offers a diverse array of methodologies to study illness-associated suffering. Objectives: In this article, we explore several contemporary methods in medical anthropology to address and study illness-associated suffering. Our overview covers methods that explore both the embodied first-person perspective of illness-associated suffering and the broader socio-cultural and political forces that influence our conceptions about ourselves, suffering and how illness is treated. Methods: Literature review. Results: This investigation highlights not only the powerful tools available in medical anthropology to examine illness-associated suffering but also the multidimensional nature of illness, personhood and suffering, which calls for an equally multimodal way of studying and addressing suffering. Conclusions: In the concluding chapter, we offer a few suggestions for future medical anthropology research and reflect on how to take into account the wholeness of a person and their relations, when trying to understand the nature of illness-associated suffering.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Haikonen et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bd1745783ba022b6fd0aahttps://doi.org/10.34632/cadernosdesaude.2026.18061
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper