Retrospective cohort study compares romiplostim-N01 with rhIL-11/rhTPO in thrombocytopenia management, indicating romiplostim's efficacy.
Cancer therapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CTIT) is a common complication in patients with solid tumors during their cancer treatment. The sole therapeutic agents approved for this indication are recombinant human interleukin-11 (rhIL-11) or recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO). Romiplostim-N01 is a novel thrombopoietic agent launched in China in 2024, which has demonstrated preliminary therapeutic efficacy in the management of CTIT. This retrospective study compared romiplostim-N01 with rhIL-11 or rhTPO for CTIT management. Ninety-two matched consecutive patients with grade ≥2 CTIT (platelet [PLT] count < 75 × 10 9 /L) were grouped into either the romiplostim-N01 group or the rhIL-11/rhTPO group. The primary endpoint was the proportion of treatment-marked responders, defined as patients who reached a PLT count of ≥100 × 10 9 /L and at least 30 × 10 9 /L higher than the pretreatment baseline within 7 days of treatment. Propensity score matching and a multivariate logistic regression model were used to estimate the treatment effects of the 2 drugs on CTIT. The 7-day marked response rate was significantly higher in the romiplostim-N01 group compared with the control group (58.7% vs 28.3%, P < .05), whereas the 14-day overall response rate was comparable between the 2 groups (89.1% vs 89.1%, P > .05). The median duration of chemotherapy delay was significantly shorter in the romiplostim-N01 group compared with the rhIL-11/rhTPO group (5.5 vs 9.5 days, P < .001). Multivariate regression analysis confirmed that romiplostim-N01 was independently associated with an elevation in PLT count. These findings position romiplostim-N01 as a favorable alternative to rhIL-11 or rhTPO in CTIT, given its enhanced early PLT response and reduced risk of chemotherapy disruption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: