Retrospective analysis evaluates safety and feasibility of [177Lu]Lu-FAPI-2286 in advanced breast and GI cancers, indicating palliative benefits.
Breast and gastrointestinal (GI) cancers remain leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide, particularly in the metastatic setting, where therapeutic options are limited, and drug resistance inevitably develops. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of [177Lu]Lu-FAPI-2286 in patients with breast and GI cancers. In this retrospective, single-center, observational analysis, we evaluated the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-FAPI-2286 in 14 patients with advanced metastatic breast (n = 10) and GI (n = 4) malignancies who had exhausted standard therapies. Adverse events were graded per CTCAE. Clinical response was assessed by evaluating symptomatic outcomes and biochemical markers, and radiographic assessment was performed using post-therapy imaging. The cohort (median age 46.5 years) was heavily pre-treated, with extensive bone, liver, and lung metastases. [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-FAPI-2286 was generally well tolerated; hematologic toxicity included Grade 3 anemia in two patients and one case of Grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Two patients experienced transient post-administration pain flares. Symptomatic pain relief was reported in four patients (28.6%), particularly among those with predominant bone metastases. Onset occurred approximately one week after therapy and lasted up to one month between cycles. Radiographic outcomes showed stable disease (SD) in 28.6% and progressive disease (PD) in 21.4% of evaluable patients; however, 50% of patients could not be evaluated radiographically due to rapid clinical decline. Median follow-up was 3.25 months (range: 2-17.5 months). In this study, [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-FAPI-2286 demonstrated feasibility and an acceptable safety profile, with meaningful palliative benefits in a subset of patients. No objective responses were observed, and the primary benefit was palliative.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rabani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: