Why the study?
Does the Oura ring accurately measure nocturnal heart rate and heart rate variability compared to standard ECG in healthy individuals?
Does the Oura ring accurately measure nocturnal heart rate and heart rate variability compared to standard ECG in healthy individuals?
The Oura ring provides highly reliable measurements of nocturnal heart rate and heart rate variability compared to standard ECG in healthy individuals.
Supports nocturnal HR/HRV monitoring with Oura in healthy adults; leaves open validation in clinical populations and larger cohorts.
The beat of a healthy heart shows significant variation among the time intervals between heartbeats. Heart rate variability (HRV) consists of periodic and aperiodic changes in the duration of the cardiac "QRS-wave" cycle. Greater nocturnal HRV has been linked with better sleep quality in healthy and clinical populations. Measurement of HRV during sleep might therefore have applications for sleep related maladies, but to collect long term data there is a strong need for comfortable measurement devices that do not disturb rest. Here we assess the Oura ring's (Ring) ability to fill this need. We measured nocturnal photopletysmogram (PPG) based inter-beat interval (IBI) data with the Ring (Oura Health Ltd, Oulu, Finland) and simultaneous R-R interval data with Faros 360 electrocardiogram (ECG) device (Mega Electronics, Kuopio, Finland) in 10 healthy individuals (3 female, 7 male). All subjects had the Ring on both hands, resulting in 20 nightly recordings for analysis. Root mean square of successive differences (rMSSD) was used as the HRV measurement. We determined heart rate HR and HRV as nightly averages for the Ring using only the normal IBI values (HRRing and rMSSDRing) and for ECG using Kubios software with automatic filter having medium setting (HRECG and rMSSDECG). The agreement between the methods was assessed by correlation analysis using Matlab software. High correlation was observed between HRRing and HRECG (r2 = .998) with a bias of -0.53 bpm (p<.001). Moreover, high correlation was found between rMSSDRing and rMSSDECG (r2 = .967) with a bias of -0.47 (p<.001). The observed HR range was 48 to 66 bpm, and rMSSD range was 21 to 78 ms. As a ring provides high wearing comfort for the measurement of nocturnal HR and HRV, the present confirmation about the reliability of the HR and HRV numbers is welcome for sleep and recovery related long-term studies. High correlation observed in rMSSD encourage comparing other parameters of HRV, too. This work was supported by Oura Health Ltd.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kinnunen et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: