Why the study?
Increasing patient complexity, multisystem organ failure, and mechanical circulatory support demands have fueled the need for specialized cardiac intensivists and diverse training pathways.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review article
Synthesizes cardiac critical care training and landscape; leaves open standardization of certification and workforce models for prospective study.
Driven by evolving patient demographics and disease burdens over the past several decades, the demands placed on the cardiac intensive care unit have steadily increased. Originally born out of the need for post-infarction arrhythmia monitoring, the modern cardiac intensive care space is now encountering progressively more complex patients with multisystem organ failure and, increasingly, complex mechanical circulatory support. This complexity has fueled a demand for specifically trained cardiac intensivists, and many different training pathways have emerged nationwide. In this article, we provide an overview of the evolution, landscape, training, and future of the subspecialty of cardiac critical care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gage et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: