Retrospective cohort analysis investigates the effect of electrode-to-lateral wall distance on ECAP amplitudes in cochlear implants, suggesting optimization strategies.
Background: Precise electrode positioning is essential for optimizing cochlear implant outcomes. However, the impact of electrode-to-lateral wall distance on neural responsiveness remains unclear. Objective: To investigate whether electrode proximity to the lateral wall influences electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) amplitudes. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 44 implanted ears with lateral wall electrodes was analyzed. High-resolution computed tomography scans were processed using OTOPLAN to measure electrode-to-lateral wall distances. Postoperative ECAPs were recorded, and correlations between distance and ECAP amplitudes were assessed at overall, channel-specific, and regional levels. Results: Electrode-to-lateral wall distances ranged from 1.91 to 3.61 mm, and ECAP amplitudes from 9.93 to 16.98 μV. A significant positive correlation was found across all electrode–ear pairs ( r =+0.58, P <0.001), indicating higher amplitudes with greater distances. Channel-level analysis showed a stronger association ( r =+0.76, P =0.004), while regional analysis identified the middle cochlear region as the primary contributor ( r =+0.34, 95% CI: 0.08-0.55). Conclusion: Greater electrode-to-lateral wall distances are associated with higher ECAP amplitudes, particularly in the middle cochlear region. These findings suggest that greater electrode-to-modiolar proximity, as achieved with perimodiolar arrays or cochlear morphology that positions electrodes further from the lateral wall, may enhance neural responsiveness. Electrode-to-lateral wall distance may serve as a clinically actionable spatial metric for anticipating ECAP responses and optimizing stimulation strategies in cochlear implant programming.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aljehani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: