Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shows improved activity rates and quicker detection in software sandbox analysis, suggesting adaptive interaction benefits.
In this paper, we present an agent-based model of a controlled detonation system for dynamic sandbox analysis of suspicious software. Instead of treating the sandbox as a passive observer, the model places an AI operator inside the analysis loop and allows it to perform adaptive GUI interactions in a plausible, isolated execution environment. The controlled detonation process is formulated as a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP), while the proposed proof-of-concept architecture combines initial profiling, VM preparation, multi-layer telemetry, and an RL policy with visual perception and temporal memory. Evaluation in a controlled emulation setting on 180 malware samples from three threat classes shows higher Activity Rates and Coverage, and shorter Time-to-Reveal than passive and fixed scripted baselines. These results support the feasibility of adaptive interactions as a promising direction for sandbox analysis, while broader external validation, matched comparisons with prior systems, and component-wise ablation remain future work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ivanchenko et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: