Key result
Specialized centers and contemporary management improve maternal and neonatal PAH outcomes despite substantial remaining risks.
Why the study?
PAH in pregnancy carries substantial risk for mother and fetus, requiring an updated overview of physiology, evaluation, risk assessment, and management reflecting newer guidelines and treatments.
This review provides an updated overview of the physiology, evaluation, risk assessment, and management of pregnant patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Specialized centers and therapies improve PAH pregnancy outcomes; review extends physiologic insights but leaves open need for prospective trials.
Pregnancy is a physiological stress test characterized by tightly coordinated interorgan communication. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in pregnancy can disrupt this adaptive network and precipitate maladaptive cardiopulmonary‐placental dysfunction. The prevalence of PAH has increased over the past 30 years and disproportionately affects women of childbearing age. As treatment options have increased and specialized treatment centers for pulmonary hypertension and cardio‐obstetrics have developed, maternal and neonatal outcomes in this population have improved. PAH nonetheless carries substantial risk for both the mother and fetus in pregnancy. We sought to provide an overview of physiology, evaluation, risk assessment, and management of pregnant patients with PAH. The review adds to existing literature with its focus on contemporary evidence, updating risk stratification and medical management given newer guidelines and treatment options, while also highlighting areas where uncertainty remains.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Argueso et al. (2026) conducted a review in Pulmonary arterial hypertension in pregnancy. Contemporary medical management and specialized treatment centers have improved maternal and neonatal outcomes for pregnant patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, though substantial risks remain.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: