Retrospective case series describes surgical management and wound healing in adults with severe metastatic Crohn's disease, suggesting multidisciplinary approaches enhance outcomes.
Background and aims Metastatic Crohn’s disease (MCD) is a rare extra-intestinal manifestation (EIM) of Crohn’s disease (CD), defined by granulomatous inflammation of skin non-contiguous to the gastrointestinal tract. This study describes the clinical features, surgical management and wound healing outcomes of the largest national surgical cohort of patients with severe MCD, a topic that remains poorly represented in the literature. Methods This retrospective single-centre case series included adults (> 18 years) undergoing surgical management for MCD from 2019 to 2024. Diagnosis was confirmed by expert clinical and histopathological assessment. We describe pre-operative optimisation, individualised surgical approaches and post-operative management delivered by a multi-disciplinary team led by consultant colorectal and plastic surgeons. Wound healing was assessed clinically in a specialist complex wounds clinic at 6 and 12 months and at final long-term follow-up. Results Eleven female patients (median age 37 years) underwent surgical intervention. At 6 and 12 months, 45.5% achieved complete healing, improving to 81.8% by final follow-up (median 36 months). Most underwent a combined medical and surgical approach with proctocolectomy and tailored perineal reconstruction. Persistent lesions and non-healing ulcers required additional adjuncts to treatment which included topical tacrolimus, hyperbaric oxygen therapy and surgical re-excision to improve healing outcomes. Conclusions MCD is a challenging condition requiring surgical treatment in refractory cases despite medical therapy. Our study highlights the need for multidisciplinary working alongside meticulous pre-operative optimisation and close post-operative follow-up to improve long-term wound healing outcomes for patients with this rare and complex disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Selvakumar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: