Analyzes overlapping ownership and quality spillovers impacting broadcasting outcomes, suggesting implications for consumer welfare.
This study develops a Hotelling model with vertical differentiation to analyze how overlapping ownership and quality spillovers shape equilibrium outcomes in the free-to-air broadcasting industry. Platforms invest in content quality and set advertising levels, which generate revenues but impose nuisance costs on viewers. The analysis shows that spillovers create free-riding incentives and lead to underinvestment in quality, while overlapping ownership relaxes competition, raising advertising intensity and reducing quality provision. The welfare consequences depend on the social desirability of advertising: when advertising is sufficiently valuable, ownership overlap and spillovers can enhance welfare; otherwise, they harm consumers and lower total welfare. Importantly, the interaction between spillovers and ownership overlap further restricts the scope for welfare improvements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Francisco Martínez‐Sánchez (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: