The spatiotemporal evolution of seepage fields and the associated hydrodynamic risk of subsequent internal erosion pose a critical threat to the structural integrity of marine and hydraulic infrastructure. To quantify these complex fluid–solid interactions, this study develops a high-fidelity numerical model—coupling the Navier–Stokes equations with the Darcy–Forchheimer resistance model and the Volume of Fluid (VOF) method—to investigate transient hydrodynamics within porous foundations under complex geometric and geological boundary conditions. Parametric analyses reveal that spatial porosity distribution fundamentally dictates the system’s seepage capacity; notably, relocating a highly permeable stratum to the shallow sub-surface eliminates upper hydraulic bottlenecks and significantly escalates total volumetric discharge. Furthermore, the study systematically evaluates the hydrodynamic efficacy of multi-dimensional seepage control structures. Results demonstrate that while increasing the vertical depth of a cutoff wall is highly efficient in restricting bulk volumetric flux, it inadvertently induces intense localized streamline convergence and flow acceleration at the structural tip. Conversely, lateral expansion of the wall base, though yielding only a moderate reduction in total seepage, successfully diffuses this concentrated flow and substantially attenuates peak pore fluid velocities. Ultimately, a combined design paradigm is proposed for practical coastal engineering applications: prioritizing vertical penetration to optimize bulk seepage reduction, concurrently integrated with moderate lateral base expansion to redistribute concentrated hydrodynamic shear stresses, thereby minimizing the hydrodynamic potential for localized piping and ensuring long-term stability against seepage-induced degradation.
Zhu et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: