Demonstrates sensitive beef adulteration detection using field-applicable assays, suggesting improved food safety measures.
Introduction: Beef adulteration with cheaper meats threatens consumer trust and public health, creating a need for detection methods beyond equipment-intensive conventional techniques like qPCR and ELISA. Here, a rapid, sensitive, and field-applicable method was developed based on a portable platform integrating Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (RPA) and CRISPR/Cas12a for bovine-derived DNA identification Methods: Species-specific genes were first rapidly amplified under isothermal conditions (37-42 °C, 15-30 min) using Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (RPA). Subsequently, CRISPR/Cas12a-mediated detection was performed in a closed-tube format: target DNA activates Cas12a’s trans-cleavage activity, leading to the non-specific cleavage of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) reporters and the production of a fluorescent signal. Results: Under the optimal conditions (reaction temperature of 37°C, incubation time of 20 min, crRNA:Cas12a ratio of 1:1, and fluorescent probe concentration of 200 nM), the assay achieves visual, equipment-free results and demonstrates high specificity for beef against pork/lamb and sensitivity to 10% adulteration in raw meat products. Discussion: This integrated approach leverages the complementary strengths of RPA and CRISPRCas12a: RPA enables rapid, sensitive amplification under isothermal conditions, while CRISPRCas12a ensures precise target recognition, effectively suppressing false-positive signals. Together, they form the foundation for a rapid, reliable, and field-applicable detection platform. The demonstrated performance highlights the assay’s strong potential as a robust, practical solution for on-site market surveillance, addressing the critical need for alternatives to complex, instrument-dependent laboratory methods. Conclusion: This study establishes a rapid, specific, and highly efficient RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a assay as a field-deployable tool for market surveillance agencies, enabling on-site screening of beef adulteration and supporting the integrity of food authenticity verification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: