Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
A systematic and reproducible "workflow"-the process that moves a scientific investigation from raw data to coherent research question to insightful contribution-should be a fundamental part of academic data-intensive research practice. In this paper, we elaborate basic principles of a reproducible data analysis workflow by defining 3 phases: the Explore, Refine, and Produce Phases. Each phase is roughly centered around the audience to whom research decisions, methodologies, and results are being immediately communicated. Importantly, each phase can also give rise to a number of research products beyond traditional academic publications. Where relevant, we draw analogies between design principles and established practice in software development. The guidance provided here is not intended to be a strict rulebook; rather, the suggestions for practices and tools to advance reproducible, sound data-intensive analysis may furnish support for both students new to research and current researchers who are new to data-intensive work.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sara Stoudt
Twitter (United States)
Váleri Vásquez
Institute for Science and International Security
Ciera Martinez
Schmidt Family Foundation
PLoS Computational Biology
University of California, Berkeley
Smith College
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Stoudt et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bd30e6f692abb725eebce — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008770
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: