Why the study?
Existing fibrillatory wave indices predicting early AF recurrence after electrical cardioversion have not accounted for nonlinear dynamics across different timescales.
Does refined multiscale entropy analysis of f-waves predict early failure of electrical cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Does refined multiscale entropy analysis of f-waves predict early failure of electrical cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Refined multiscale entropy analysis of f-waves improves the prediction of early electrical cardioversion failure in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Electrical cardioversion (ECV) is a well-established strategy for atrial fibrillation (AF) management. Despite its high initial effectiveness, a high relapsing rate is also found. Hence, identification of patients at high risk of early AF recurrence is crucial for a rationale therapeutic strategy. For that purpose, a set of indices characterizing fibrillatory (f -) waves have been proposed, but they have not considered nonlinear dynamics present at different timescales within the cardiovascular system. This work thus explores whether a multiscale entropy (MSE) analysis of the f -waves can improve preoperative predictions of ECV outcome. Thus, two MSE approaches were considered, i.e., traditional MSE and a refined version (RMSE). Both algorithms were applied to the main f -waves component extracted from lead V1 and entropy values were computed for the first 20 time-scales. As a reference, dominant frequency (DF) and f -wave amplitude (FWA) were also computed. A total of 70 patients were analyzed, and all parameters but FWA showed statistically significant differences between those relapsing to AF and maintaining sinus rhythm during a follow-up of 4 weeks. RMSE reported the best results for the scale 19, improving predictive ability up to an 8% with respect to DAF and FWA. Consequently, investigation of nonlinear dynamics at large time-scales can provide useful insights able to improve predictions of ECV failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cirugeda et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: