Atrial fibrillatory frequency exhibits circadian variations that correlate with ventricular rate changes, suggesting autonomic nervous system modulation in persistent atrial fibrillation.
Supports autonomic modulation of ventricular response in persistent AF; hypothesis-generating and leaves open therapeutic implications.
Atrial fibrillatory frequency reflects the atrial refractory period during AF. This study was conducted to investigate noninvasively the diurnal fluctuations of fibrillatory frequency in persistent human atrial fibrillation and to determine the relationship between changes in ventricular rate and fibrillatory frequency. Ambulatory ECGs were recorded in 30 patients (18 men, 12 women, mean age 60 +/- 11 years) with persistent AF (> 24 hours). AF frequency was measured in 1-minute ECG segments by subtracting averaged QRST complexes and applying Fourier analysis to the resulting signals at 4 PM, 10 PM, 4 AM, and 10 AM. Peak frequency was determined in the 3-12 Hz frequency band. Mean fibrillatory frequency measured 6.6 +/- 0.6 Hz (range 5.0-7.8 Hz). Two different frequency patterns were distinguished comparing maximal diurnal versus nocturnal fibrillatory frequency. In six (20%) patients an increase (P = 0.045) in nocturnal fibrillatory frequency (type I) was found. In the remaining 24 (80%) patients a decrease (P < 0.001) in fibrillatory frequency occurred (type II). Type I AF showed a strong inverse correlation between relative changes (percent) in ventricular rate and fibrillatory frequency obtained from two consecutive measurement points (r = -0.88 to -.97, P < 0.01), whereas in type II AF a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.36 to 0.41, P < 0.05) was detected. These data indicate a circadian pattern in AF frequency that concurs with ventricular rate changes suggesting a modulating influence of the autonomic nervous system on atrial electrophysiology in persistent human AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bollmann et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: