Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Protecting user data privacy can be achieved via many methods, from statistical transformations to generative models. However, they all have critical drawbacks. For example, creating a transformed data set using traditional techniques is highly time-consuming. Also, recent deep learning-based solutions require significant computational resources in addition to long training phases, and differentially private-based solutions may undermine data utility. In this paper, we propose ε ϵ -PrivateSMOTE, a technique designed to protect against re-identification and linkage attacks, particularly addressing cases with a high re-identification risk. Our proposal combines synthetic data generation via noise-induced interpolation with differential privacy principles to obfuscate high-risk cases. We demonstrate how ε ϵ -PrivateSMOTE is capable of achieving competitive results in privacy risk and better predictive performance when compared to multiple traditional and state-of-the-art privacy-preservation methods, including generative adversarial networks, variational autoencoders, and differential privacy baselines. We also show how our method improves time requirements by at least a factor of 9 and is a resource-efficient solution that ensures high performance without specialised hardware.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carvalho et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: