Why the study?
Does coronary flow-based FFR (fFFR) derived from 3-D reconstruction of IVUS and X-ray angiography correlate with measured pressure wire-derived FFR in stenotic coronary arteries?
Does coronary flow-based FFR (fFFR) derived from 3-D reconstruction of IVUS and X-ray angiography correlate with measured pressure wire-derived FFR in stenotic coronary arteries?
A novel computational method combining IVUS and X-ray angiography to calculate FFR shows good correlation with invasive pressure wire-derived FFR.
We aimed to present an alternative method for calculating fractional flow reserve (FFR) from 3-D reconstruction of a coronary artery, based on coronary (X-ray) angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), to evaluate the ischemic-risk of stenosis and the relationship between FFR and geometrical features of the coronary lesion. The reconstruction of the 3-D catheter trajectory was obtained by the vertical intersection of spatial surfaces which were derived from the 2-D catheter curves in the angiography plane. Computational fluid dynamics was applied to calculate the hemodynamics in the coronary arteries and coronary flow-based FFR (fFFR) was obtained. Twenty-two stenotic coronary arteries were included in this paper for the evaluation of the proposed method. Good correlation between fFFR and the measured pressure wire-derived FFR was found ( F = 0.916 and P < 0.01). Based on our computer modeling, the fFFR values correlated negatively with the severity of the stenosis ( r = −0.784 and P < 0.01). However, fFFR had no significant correlation with coronary curvature, lesion length, and angle. Our method therefore provides a coronary vascular model-based means for computing FFR, and makes full use of the advantages of IVUS examination to diagnose the diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: