Why the study?
Elevated heart rate increases death or transplant risk in pediatric DCM, but whether heart rate serves as a clinical marker to guide therapy was poorly investigated.
Does heart rate reduction with carvedilol improve left ventricular ejection fraction in children with dilated cardiomyopathy?
Does heart rate reduction with carvedilol improve left ventricular ejection fraction in children with dilated cardiomyopathy?
In children with dilated cardiomyopathy, heart rate reduction with carvedilol is safe and correlates significantly with improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction and dimensions.
Heart rate reduction with carvedilol was associated with LVEF gains in pediatric dilated cardiomyopathy; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
Introduction: An elevated heart rate is associated with an increased risk of death or cardiac transplant in children with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Whether heart rate is a clinical marker to address therapy, is poorly investigated in children. Aim: To investigate the relationship between heart rate reduction (HRR) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in DCM, treated with carvedilol. Methods: This is a multi center retrospective analysis conducted on all children with DCM (aged <18 years) between 2013 and 2020, with LVEF <40% and treated with carvedilol. Carvedilol was up titrated to the maximal tolerated dose or to 1 mg/kg/day. Echocardiographic data on left ventricular function and dimension were collected. The relationship between HRR and LVEF, left ventricular end-diastolic (LVEDd) and end-systolic diameter (LVESd) was assessed before and after HRR with carvedilol, using regression analysis. Results: 100 patients were enrolled (M: 51%; age 7 ± 8 years). The mean LVEF was 30.2 ± 10% before treatment and 43.7 ± 9.6% after treatment, at the maximum therapeutic dose ( p < 0.0001). There was a positive relationship between HRR and increase in LVEF ( R 2 = 0.06, p = 0.014). A HRR of >20% correlated with an improvement in LVEF >13%. At 3 years follow up, HRR demonstrated a significant reduction of LVESd (R2 = 0.1, p = 0.003) LVEDd (R2 = 0.07, p = 0.008) and LVEF recovery up to 15% ( p < 0.0001). No deaths or heart transplant occurred during follow-up. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that HRR is safe and improvement in LVEF is related to the degree of HRR. The magnitude of LVEF improvement was enhanced by a major reduction in HR. It provides evidence that HRR could be used as a clinical marker to treat HF in children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adorisio et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: