Why the study?
Does transcatheter electrical ablation safely and effectively interrupt anomalous conduction in children with SVT and accessory pathways?
Does transcatheter electrical ablation safely and effectively interrupt anomalous conduction in children with SVT and accessory pathways?
Transcatheter electrical ablation may offer an alternative to surgery for permanent interruption of accessory pathways in carefully selected children with SVT.
Mixed pediatric case outcomes with transcatheter ablation leave efficacy unresolved; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective trials before clinical consideration.
Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), the most common sustained symptomatic arrhythmia of childhood, is often supported by a manifest or concealed accessory pathway. Permanent interruption of the accessory pathway usually requires surgical division. Recent experience with electrical ablation of posterior septal pathways in adults prompted us to apply the technique to children. Six children, ages 8 to 15 years, underwent a complete electrophysiological study followed by transcatheter electrical ablation. Five of the 6 children, 3 with a right posterior septal and 2 with a left posterior septal pathway, were approached with the ablation catheter at the os of the coronary sinus. In the remaining patient, a left lateral pathway was mapped with an electrode catheter in the coronary sinus and then approached with the ablation catheter through the patent foramen into the left atrium. Two patients are asymptomatic 18-24 months postablation; one patient had return of anomalous conduction between 7 and 21 days after ablation. Two patients had transient interruption of anomalous conduction, whereas one patient experienced no effect. We conclude that in carefully selected patients, transcatheter electrical ablation offers an alternative to surgery for permanent interruption of an accessory pathway.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bromberg et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: