Why the study?
Saphenous vein graft failure is predominantly seen at the valve site, and avoiding valves during harvest may help reduce graft failure.
Does upright CT improve the detection of saphenous vein valves and tributaries compared to supine CT?
Does upright CT improve the detection of saphenous vein valves and tributaries compared to supine CT?
Upright CT may detect more saphenous valves than supine CT; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
The saphenous veins (SV) are frequently employed as bypass grafts. The SV graft failure is predominantly seen at the valve site. Avoiding valves during vein harvest would help reduce graft failure. We endeavored to detect SV valves, tributaries, and vessel size employing upright CT for the raw cadaver venous samples and in healthy volunteers.Five cadaver legs were scanned. The anatomical analysis showed 3.0 (IQR: 2.0-3.0) valves and 13.50 (IQR: 10.00-16.25) tributaries. The upright CT completely detected, compared to 2.0 (IQR: 1.5-2.5, p=0.06) valves and 9.5 (IQR: 7.5-13.0, p=0.13) tributaries by supine CT. From a total 190 volunteers, 138 (men:75, women:63) were included. The number of valves from the SF junction to 35 cm were significantly higher in upright CT than in supine CT bilaterally [upright vs. supine, Right: 4 (IQR: 3-5) vs. 2 (IQR:1-2), p<0.0001, Left: 4 (IQR: 3-5) vs. 2 (IQR: 1-2), p <0.0001]. The number of tributaries and vessel area was also higher for upright compared with supine CT.Upright CT enable detection of SV valves, tributaries, and vessel size non-invasively. Although not tested here, it is expected that upright CT might potentially improve the graft assessment for bypass surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakahara et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: