Why the study?
What is the histological quality and preoperative color flow duplex imaging profile of long saphenous vein conduits used for coronary artery bypass grafting?
What is the histological quality and preoperative color flow duplex imaging profile of long saphenous vein conduits used for coronary artery bypass grafting?
The majority of long saphenous veins used for CABG have some degree of fibrosis that varies along the vein's length, suggesting color flow duplex imaging may be useful for perioperative conduit selection.
Variable fibrosis affects most saphenous veins for CABG; leaves open whether duplex imaging improves conduit selection.
The aim of this study was first to select preoperatively suitable long saphenous vein (LSV) segments by using color flow duplex imaging (CFDI) and second to evaluate the quality of the harvested LSVs histologically. Forty LSVs in 38 consecutive patients (mean age 63 years) were examined by CFDI for patency and luminal diameter. None of the patients had documented previous deep venous thrombosis or superficial thrombophlebitis. Perioperatively, 79 LSV specimens were harvested from the ankle, knee, and midthigh regions and examined histologically for wall calcification and fibrosis. According to the amount of fibrosis present the specimens were classified as being normal or mildly, moderately, or severely affected. All LSVs were found patent and nonvaricose, and their diameter ranged from 0.18 to 0.54 cm at the ankle, 0.29 to 0.69 cm at the knee, and 0.25 to 0.77 cm at the midthigh level. On histology 11% of the specimens were found to be normal, and 43% were mildly, 38% moderately, and 8% severely fibrotic. Also, various grades of fibrosis were found in different sites of the same vein. None of the specimens had calcification. It is concluded that the majority of the LSVs used for coronary artery bypass grafting have some degree of fibrosis. The histologic appearance of the LSV wall in a particular site cannot predict the condition of vein throughout its length. CFDI can be useful in the perioperative conduit selection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giannoukas et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: