Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article examines a theory of kingship that grew popular at the ninth-century court of Charlemagne. Suited to Carolingian articulations of power, it centered the emperor in a cosmic sense. This included long-term weather trends, a concept I argue is akin to climate. Since a bad ruler could produce poor weather, the theory was a double-edged sword, providing opportunities for political critique. Carolingian courtiers viewed atmospheric events as a mirror for the political drama of the period. I examine the close links they drew between weather, power, and divine judgement. I argue that an anonymous biographer of Louis the Pious drew complex connections between the madness of the weather (in the form of climatically unusual floods) and the madness of rebellion. I also describe the climatic dimensions of Nithard’s Histories, which argue for a long-term deterioration of weather (over 30 years or more) linked to royal instability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David J. Patterson (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: