Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) is associated with adverse outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS); however, the prognostic significance of serum amyloid A (SAA), also an important inflammatory marker, remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: The ability of SAA, in combination with CRP, to predict clinical outcomes was evaluated in 277 patients with NSTE-ACS. Patients were classified according to the presence or absence of elevated SAA (>0.8 mg/dl) and elevated high-sensitivity CRP (>0.200 mg/dl) on admission: group 1, both SAA and CRP normal (n=133); group 2, SAA normal, but CRP elevated (n=30); group 3, SAA elevated, but CRP normal (n=28); and group 4, both SAA and CRP elevated (n=86). In groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, the rates of combined endpoints including death, (re)infarction, or urgent target-vessel revascularization at 30 days were 8%, 3%, 25%, and 23%, respectively (p=0.002). Multivariate analysis showed that as compared with group 1, the odds ratios for combined endpoints in groups 2, 3, and 4 were 0.50 (p=0.30), 1.95 (p=0.038), and 1.86 (p=0.044), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the level of CRP, elevated SAA is associated with adverse 30-day outcomes in patients with NSTE-ACS, so SAA is a better predictor of clinical outcome than CRP in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kosuge et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: