The Correct and the Appropriate in the Appreciation of Nature

Robert Stecker

doi:10.1093/bjaesthetics/37.4.393

October 1, 1997The British Journal of Aesthetics

The Correct and the Appropriate in the Appreciation of Nature

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

This article examines the concepts of correct and appropriate responses to nature and their implications for aesthetics.
Philosophical analysis of aesthetic appreciation of nature.
Exploration of various perspectives regarding correct and appropriate responses.
Identified key differences between correct and appropriate appreciation of nature.
Discussed implications of these differences for understanding aesthetic value.

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Implication

Journal article explores aesthetics in nature appreciation, suggesting philosophical implications.

Abstract

Journal Article THE CORRECT AND THE APPROPRIATE IN THE APPRECIATION OF NATURE Get access Robert Stecker Robert Stecker Department of Philosophy, Central Michigan UniversityMount Pleasant, MI 48859, USA. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The British Journal of Aesthetics, Volume 37, Issue 4, October 1997, Pages 393–402, https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/37.4.393 Published: 01 October 1997

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Robert Stecker (1997) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bdde327b545b111a9214d https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/37.4.393

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

The Correct and the Appropriate in the Appreciation of Nature

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

The Correct and the Appropriate in the Appreciation of Nature

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading