This article argues for modifying the contract theory in historical fiction to include historical figures, enhancing audience engagement.
The typical criticism that a work of historical fiction is aesthetically flawed because it is historically inaccurate is puzzling. In this article, I argue for a fundamental modification of Iskra Fileva’s contract solution to the puzzle of historical fiction. I agree with Christopher Bartel and Fileva that other solutions in the literature, like appealing to genre, imaginative resistance, and import–export inconsistency, fail to solve the puzzle. However, I recommend that the contract between creator and audience be expanded to include a third party: the historical figures featured in the historical fiction. In this way, we make contracts with the dead when we engage with historical fiction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nathan Huffine (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: