Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
I think that any modern hermeneutics is a hermeneutics with a double edge and a double function. It is an effort to struggle against idols, and, consequently, it is destructive. It is a critique of ideologies in the sense of Marx; it is a critique of all flights and evasions into otherworlds in the sense of Nietzsche; a struggle against childhood fables and against securing illusions in the sense of psychoanalysis. In this sense, any hermeneutics must be disalienating, aimed at disalienation, at demystification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joseph A. Buttigieg (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: