This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This article provides benchmark data on within-group effect sizes from published randomized clinical trials that supported the efficacy of problem-solving therapy (PST) for depression among adults. Benchmarks are broken down by type of depression (major or minor), type of outcome measure (interview or self-report scale), whether PST was provided to elderly participants in poor health, and whether an intent-to-treat analysis was conducted. Practitioners can compare these benchmarks to their effect size in providing PST with depressed clients as a basis for deciding whether the way they are adopting or adapting this intervention is satisfactory or needs to be modified or replaced by a different intervention approach. These benchmarks also have potential utility for future implementation research on PST for depression.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rubin et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: