Why the study?
Does a 10-day altitude training camp at 1828 meters alter blood lactate levels and heart rate during and after an incremental treadmill test in varsity cross-country runners?
Does a 10-day altitude training camp at 1828 meters alter blood lactate levels and heart rate during and after an incremental treadmill test in varsity cross-country runners?
A 10-day altitude training camp at 1828 meters significantly increases post-exercise blood lactate levels and decreases average heart rate during an incremental treadmill test in varsity cross-country runners.
May caution against immediate post-altitude lactate threshold use in runners; leaves open performance effects pending RCTs.
International Journal of Exercise Science 10(1): 97-107, 2017. Altitude training has been shown to alter blood lactate (BL) levels due to alterations resulting from acclimatization. This study aims to estimate the impact of altitude training on BL changes immediately following an incremental treadmill test and during recovery before and after 10-day altitude training at approximately 1828 meters. Eight varsity cross-country runners performed an incremental treadmill test (ITT), pre and post-altitude training. Resting and post-warm-up BL values were recorded. During ITT, heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SpO2), and time to exhaustion were monitored. BL was also measured post-ITT at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 minutes. The average of all BL values was higher following altitude intervention (8.8 ± 4.6 mmol/L) compared to pre-intervention (7.4 ± 3.3 mmol/L). These differences were statistically significant (t(6) = -2.40, p = .026). BL immediately (0 minutes) after the ITT was higher following the altitude intervention (13.6 ± 3.6 mmol/L) compared to pre-intervention (9.7 ± 3.8 mmol/L) and was statistically significant (t(7) = -3.30, p = .006). Average HR during the ITT was lower following the altitude intervention (176.9 ± 11.1 bpm) compared to pre (187 ± 9.5 bpm), these differences were statistically significant (t(28)= 18.07, p=
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Diebel et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: