The computer science literature discusses code and algorithms extensively, but not always reliably. Tool support can help ensure integrity between code and explanation so that published papers are more reliable. A versatile, lightweight tool to support explaining code for publication is justified, described and compared with alternatives. The tool works with Java, C and similar languages, and provides support for publishing explanations of real code in LATEX, XML, HTML, etc.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harold Thimbleby (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: