Why the study?
Does nipradilol improve symptoms, cardiac function, and neurohumoral factors in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy?
Does nipradilol improve symptoms, cardiac function, and neurohumoral factors in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy?
Nipradilol improved NYHA functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction, and neurohumoral factors in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.
Nipradilol-associated LVEF gains in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy are hypothesis-generating; randomized trials needed before practice change.
This study investigated the therapeutic efficacy of a new beta-blocker, nipradilol, a non-selective agent with vasodilating activity, for the treatment of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). The New York Heart Association functional class improved in the nipradilol group (n = 9, p < 0.01), but not in the control group who received conventional therapy (n = 9). The observation period was 19 +/- 7 months in the nipradilol group, and 20 +/- 9 months in the control group. Before therapy there was no difference in heart rate between the 2 groups (76 +/- 12 vs 79 +/- 15 beats/min). The end-diastolic and end-systolic left ventricular dimensions decreased in the nipradilol group (p < 0.05), but not in the control group. Radionuclide ventriculography revealed that the left ventricular ejection fraction increased in the nipradilol group (27 +/- 8 to 41 +/- 18%, p < 0.05), but not in the control group (27 +/- 11 to 27 +/- 8%). Plasma norepinephrine tended to be lowered, although not significantly, whereas plasma alpha atrial natriuretic peptide significantly decreased after the therapy (p < 0.01) in the treatment group. Lymphocyte beta-adrenoceptors were up-regulated in the nipradilol group (p < 0.05). None of these parameters changed during the observation period in the control group. Thus, nipradilol improved symptoms and cardiac function with a favorable effect on neurohumoral factors in patients with DCM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoshikawa et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: