Why the study?
Does preceding treatment with heparin or antithrombin III improve acute and 4-month outcomes in patients undergoing PTCA for unstable angina?
Does preceding treatment with heparin or antithrombin III improve acute and 4-month outcomes in patients undergoing PTCA for unstable angina?
Preprocedural heparin infusion or antithrombin III substitution in patients with unstable angina undergoing PTCA does not significantly reduce acute complications or 4-month event rates, nor does it reduce the need for extra heparin during the procedure.
No outcome benefit from preprocedural heparin or antithrombin III in unstable angina PTCA; leaves open efficacy questions for randomized trials.
Seventy-nine patients undergoing percutane ous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) for unsta ble angina were analyzed with respect to preceding an tithrombin treatment; group I comprised patients (n = 26) without antecedent antithrombin therapy; group II, pa tients (n = 30) with heparin infusion for ≥24 h, and group III patients (n = 23) with ongoing heparin infusion and given antithrombin III concentrate immediately before the procedure because of plasma antithrombin III <85%. Immediate results were 89% (70 of 79) angiographic suc cess, five (6%) subacute occlusions (two subsequent non-Q wave infarctions), no emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and no immediate mortality. There were no differences between the groups. From dis charge to 4 months, one patient died, one had a nonfatal infarction, and 24 (30%) had repeated PTCA or CABG. The cumulative 4-month event rate was 11 of 26 (42%) in group I, 10 of 30 (33%) in group II, and 7 of 23 (30%) in group III (NS). During PTCA, heparin bolus administra tion was guided by activated clotting time (ACT), aiming at>300 s. Baseline ACT was significantly less in patients not treated with heparin (129 ± 34 s in group I vs. 179 ± 38 and 162 ± 29 s in groups II and III, respectively; p < 0.05), but during the procedure, patients from all groups required the same amount of heparin (13,900 ± 4,800, 13,000 ± 6,800, and 13,000 ± 5,700 IU, respectively; NS) to reach similar maximum ACT levels (334 ± 36, 312 ± 32, and 319 ± 44 s, respectively; NS). Patients receiving warfarin ( n = 8) responded with a higher ACT (456 ± 110 s; p < 0.05) on lower doses of heparin (10,000 ± 3,800 IU). In conclusion, patients with unstable angina receiv ing individualized antithrombotic therapy can be success fully treated with PTCA, with an acute complication rate and long-term results comparable with those expected in patients undergoing elective procedures. The value of an tithrombin III substitution must be evaluated in random ized trials. Preprocedural heparin infusion does not re duce the need of extra heparin during the procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grip et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: