Why the study?
Does a tailored six-week computerized cognitive training program improve cognitive outcomes in healthy older adults compared to a nonspecific program?
Does a tailored six-week computerized cognitive training program improve cognitive outcomes in healthy older adults compared to a nonspecific program?
Tailored computerized cognitive training may offer broader cognitive benefits than nonspecific training in healthy older adults, with baseline cognitive level and subjective concerns predicting training success.
Tailored training showed no superiority over nonspecific training in healthy older adults; challenges presumed benefits of personalization and leaves open within-group effects.
Computerized cognitive training (CCT) can improve cognition in older adults. However, specific programs for this target group have rarely been developed, and predictors of training success are largely unclear. In a randomized controlled pilot trial, we examined effects of a six-week CCT, tailored to the cognitive profile of healthy older adults (EG, n = 21) as compared to a nonspecific CCT (CG, n = 18) matched in frequency and intensity. No interaction effects between Group and Time were found. However, within-group analysis showed significant gains in verbal and non-verbal memory, executive and visuospatial functions and subjective cognitive concerns (SCC) in the EG, while the CG only benefitted in non-verbal memory and set-shifting. Low cognitive performance and lower SCC at baseline were the most consistent predictors of cognitive gains in the EG. Thus, CCTs specifically tailored to older adults seem advantageous compared to non-specific CCT. Further, we conclude that SCC may be related to reduced cognitive plasticity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kalbe et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: