Why the study?
Does paclitaxel-eluting stent and tirofiban improve restenosis and myocardial flow in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing postfibrinolysis angioplasty?
Does paclitaxel-eluting stent and tirofiban improve restenosis and myocardial flow in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing postfibrinolysis angioplasty?
In STEMI patients undergoing postfibrinolysis angioplasty, paclitaxel-eluting stents reduced late lumen loss but not binary restenosis compared to bare-metal stents, and tirofiban did not improve epicardial or myocardial perfusion.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Paclitaxel-eluting stents and tirofiban confer no restenosis or perfusion advantage in postfibrinolysis STEMI angioplasty; challenges routine adoption over bare-metal stents.
BACKGROUND: A catheter-based approach after fibrinolysis is recommended if fibrinolysis is likely to be successful in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. We designed a 2x2 randomized, open-label, multicenter trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the paclitaxel-eluting stent and tirofiban administered after fibrinolysis but before catheterization to optimize the results of this reperfusion strategy. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomly assigned 436 patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction to (1) bare-metal stent without tirofiban, (2) bare-metal stent with tirofiban, (3) paclitaxel-eluting stent without tirofiban, and (4) paclitaxel-eluting stent with tirofiban. All patients were initially treated with tenecteplase and enoxaparin. Tirofiban was started 120 minutes after tenecteplase in those patients randomly assigned to tirofiban. Cardiac catheterization was performed within the first 3 to 12 hours after inclusion, and stenting (randomized paclitaxel or bare stent) was applied to the culprit artery. The primary objectives were the rate of in-segment binary restenosis of paclitaxel-eluting stent compared with that of bare-metal stent and the effect of tirofiban on epicardial and myocardial flow before and after mechanical revascularization. At 12 months, in-segment binary restenosis was similar between paclitaxel-eluting stent and bare-metal stent (10.1% versus 11.3%; relative risk, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.74 to 1.52; P=0.89). However, late lumen loss (0.04+/-0.055 mm versus 0.27+/-0.057 mm, P=0.003) was reduced in the paclitaxel-eluting stent group. No evidence was found of any association between the use of tirofiban and any improvement in the epicardial and myocardial perfusion. Major bleeding was observed in 6.1% of patients receiving tirofiban and in 2.7% of patients not receiving it (relative risk, 2.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.86 to 5.73; P=0.14). CONCLUSIONS: This trial does not provide evidence to support the use of tirofiban after fibrinolysis to improve epicardial and myocardial perfusion. Compared with bare-metal stent, paclitaxel-eluting stent significantly reduced late loss but appeared not to reduce in-segment binary restenosis. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00306228.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sánchez et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: