Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The current pathological methods and existing serum tumor markers for gynaecologic malignancies does not provide efficient information regarding the therapeutic intervention to which a cancer responds. Cancers classified based on the molecular profile determines the abnormalities at the genetic level. This in turn has led to the discovery of cancer-specific biomarkers. The cancer-specific biomarkers are used against target specific gene products or pathways. A molecular profile includes both genetic and epigenetic signatures which are specific to a particular type of cancer. Genetic and epigenetic markers are more sensitive and specific which may be efficient in early diagnosis of cancer and aids in multiple therapeutic alternatives. In future, a combination of various biomarkers from genomics (genes, micro RNA [miRNA], mutations, Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms [SNPs]), proteomics (peptides, proteins, modifications) and metabolomics (small-molecule intermediates, hormones, systemic compounds) will provide a promising assay platform that suits specific treatment options.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
V Shilpa (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: