The crystal structures and textures of a family of sequence-designed periodic polypeptides were investigated and analyzed using X-ray diffraction, vibrational spectroscopy, and cross-polarization magic angle spinning 13C nuclear magnetic resonance. The repetitive amino acid sequences are described by −[(AG)xEG]−, with integer x from 3 to 6. These macromolecules were prepared via bacterial expression of artificial genes and are monodisperse. Crystalline samples were obtained, and the interpretation of the X-ray diffraction results was aided by the generation of computer-simulated X-ray diffraction patterns. This allowed direct comparisons to be made with the observed texture-oriented X-ray diffraction photographs. All diffraction and spectroscopic evidence supports an antiparallel (ap) β-sheet structure, and all structures index on orthorhombic sublattices similar to those reported for Bombyx mori silk fibroin and poly(l-alanylglycine). The unit cell parameters for poly(AG)3EG, for example, are a = 0.948 nm (hydrogen-bond direction), b = 1.060 nm (ap β-sheet stacking direction), and c = 0.695 nm (chain direction). Selective line broadening is observed for wide-angle diffraction signals with l ≠ 0 (for the 211 in particular) and gives an estimated crystal size of <4 nm in the chain direction. This, coupled with the appearance of a low-angle particle interference peak at 3.6 nm, indicates a crystal size over an order of magnitude less than the chain length and suggests an adjacent reentry chain-folded lamellar structure incorporating the ap β-sheet architecture. A structure with polar ap β-sheets and γ-turns, stacking with the hydrophobic methyl groups of the alanyl residues in contact, is selected by X-ray structure refinement to give the best match with the experimental data. The pattern of crystallization behavior of the poly(AG)xEG family is consistent with the folding periodicity being in-phase with the amino acid sequence so that the glutamic acid residues are confined to the lamellar surfaces.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krejchi et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: