An inflight calibration for AVHRR visible and near-IR bands is discussed and applied to NOAA-7, NOAA-9 and NOAA-11 from 1981 to 1990. The approach, independent of ground support, relies on three unique earth-atmosphere phenomena: molecular scattering over the ocean for absolute visible band calibration, ocean glint to transfer the calibration from the visible band to the near-IR band, and desert reflectance to monitor, independently, the stability of the visible and near-IR bands. The resulting two calibration methods differ in the brightness range and spectral response of the radiance source (molecular scattering versus desert reflectance). Both methods agreed on calibration deterioration for NOAA-9 of 10 ± 3 per cent in the visible band and 16 ± 2 per cent in the near-IR shortly after launch, and 22 ± 2 per cent in both bands three years later. The ocean method showed an increase of 6 per cent and 9 per cent in the sensitivity of the visible and near-IR bands respectively over the lifetime of NOAA-7. However, the desert method showed a decrease of 10 and 12 per cent, respectively, in the two bands. Possible reasons for the differences between the resultant calibration for NOAA-7 from the two methods are discussed. NOAA-11 was calibrated using the desert radiances only. Its inflight response was lower from the preflight response by 21 per cent in channel 1 and 33 per cent in channel 2, a short time after launch. Recommendations for the absolute calibration of NOAA-7, -9 and -11 are given for channels 1 and 2 as a function of time and are compared with other published AVHRR calibrations. The calibration deterioration results in a change in the vegetation index (NDVI) between 0.0 and 0.09. A simple correction scheme is suggested for uncorrected NOAA-7, -9 and -II NDVI and implications of the calibration ratio on AVHRR remote sensing are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaufman et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: