Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We examine the reconstructions and surface energies of ZnSe(100) surfaces by first-principles total-energy calculations. The surface energies for the Zn- and Se-terminated (1×{}1), (1×{}2), (2×{}1), (2×{}2), and Zn-terminated (4×{}2) reconstructed surfaces consisting of various combinations of dimers and vacancies are determined as a function of coverage and atomic chemical potential. For the Zn- and Se-terminated surfaces, dimerization lowers the energies by 2.12 and 1.08 eV per dimer, respectively. When exchange with bulk Zn or Se reservoirs is considered, a c(2×{}2) Zn-vacancy structure is found to be energetically more favorable than a dimer structure for the Zn-terminated surface, while a (2×{}1) dimer structure is the most favorable one for the Se-terminated surface.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: