This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Neural constituency parsers have reached practical performance on news-domain benchmarks. However, their generalization ability to other domains remains weak. Existing findings on cross-domain constituency parsing are only made on a limited number of domains. Tracking this, we manually annotate a high-quality constituency treebank containing five domains. We analyze challenges to open-domain constituency parsing using a set of linguistic features on various strong constituency parsers. Primarily, we find that 1) BERT significantly increases parsers' cross-domain performance by reducing their sensitivity on the domain-variant features. 2) Compared with single metrics such as unigram distribution and OOV rate, challenges to open-domain constituency parsing arise from combinations of factors, including cross-domain lexical and constituent structure variations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: