Key result
The patchy-type wireless 12-lead ECG device significantly reduced the overall time for ECG acquisition and transmission compared to the conventional device (median 130 vs 254 seconds).
Why the study?
Prehospital 12-lead ECG is recommended for STEMI but not widely established, and the time-efficiency and feasibility of a patchy-type wireless device in an ambulance needed verification.
Does a patchy-type wireless 12-lead ECG device reduce the time required for ECG acquisition and transmission by EMTs during ambulance transport compared to a conventional 12-lead ECG?
Population
18 EMTs
Comparison
Patchy-type 12-lead ECG device vs conventional 12-lead ECG device
Design
Simulation-based prospective randomized crossover-controlled study
Authors
Loading...
May accelerate prehospital ECG workflows by EMTs; extends RCT evidence for patchy wireless devices in ambulance transport.
RCT (n=18)
Randomized crossover
No
Does a patchy-type wireless 12-lead ECG device reduce the time required for ECG acquisition and transmission by EMTs during ambulance transport compared to a conventional 12-lead ECG?
Absolute Event Rate: 130% vs 254%
p-value: p=<.001
A patchy-type wireless 12-lead ECG device significantly reduces the time required for prehospital ECG acquisition and transmission by EMTs compared to conventional devices, potentially accelerating STEMI care.
Yoon et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Prehospital 12-lead ECG acquisition (n=18). Patchy-type wireless 12-lead ECG (P-ECG) vs. Conventional 12-lead ECG (C-ECG) was evaluated on Overall time interval from preparation to transmission completion (seconds) (p=<.001). The patchy-type wireless 12-lead ECG device significantly reduced the overall time for ECG acquisition and transmission compared to the conventional device (median 130 vs 254 seconds).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: