Key result
Virtual Functional Assessment Index derived from CCTA showed a strong correlation (r=0.82) with invasively measured FFR for estimating the severity of coronary lesions in arterial branches.
Why the study?
Does CCTA-derived Virtual Functional Assessment Index (vFAI) accurately estimate the hemodynamic significance of coronary stenoses in arterial branches compared to invasive FFR?
Does CCTA-derived Virtual Functional Assessment Index (vFAI) accurately estimate the hemodynamic significance of coronary stenoses in arterial branches compared to invasive FFR?
A novel CCTA-derived computational method for calculating vFAI in coronary arterial branches showed strong correlation with invasive FFR in a small proof-of-concept study.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
vFAI may aid noninvasive branch assessment; hypothesis-generating in small proof-of-concept study and requires larger validation.
The development of non-invasive methods for the accurate hemodynamic assessment of the coronary vasculature has become a non-trivial matter for the everyday clinical practice. Virtual Functional Assessment Index has already been suggested as a valid alternative to the invasively measured FFR but only on coronary arterial segments. In this work, we propose a novel method for the estimation of the severity of coronary lesions in arterial branches from CCTA derived images. Four left arterial branches were reconstructed in 3D using our in-house developed 3D reconstruction algorithm, and were subjected to computational blood flow simulations for the final calculation of the vFAI through the whole arterial branch. Strong correlation was found (r=0.82) between the two methods. A small relative error of 3.2% and a small trend of overestimation (0.023, SD=0.088) were also observed. All pathological cases presenting ischemia, were correctly discriminated by our method as hemodynamically significant lesions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siogkas et al. (2017) studied Coronary stenoses (n=4). Virtual Functional Assessment Index (vFAI) from CCTA vs. Invasively measured FFR was evaluated on Correlation between vFAI and FFR (r=0.82). Virtual Functional Assessment Index derived from CCTA showed a strong correlation (r=0.82) with invasively measured FFR for estimating the severity of coronary lesions in arterial branches.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: