Why the study?
The study was conducted to develop a mobile application enabling remote disease management and heart rate monitoring for patients with cardiac pathologies using non-contact photoplethysmography.
Does a non-contact photoplethysmography iOS application accurately estimate heart rate compared to a medical-grade pulse-oximeter?
Comparison
Smartphone non-contact photoplethysmography application vs medical-grade pulse-oximeter
Authors
Loading...
May enable accessible remote HR monitoring; leaves open rigorous validation before clinical use.
Does a non-contact photoplethysmography iOS application accurately estimate heart rate compared to a medical-grade pulse-oximeter?
A smartphone-based non-contact photoplethysmography application can estimate heart rate with a 3% error rate compared to standard pulse oximetry, offering potential for remote cardiac monitoring.
Maestre et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: