Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Formyl peptide chemotactic receptors affinity-labeled with N-formyl-Nle-Leu-Phe-Nle-[125I]iodo-Tyr-Lys (where Nle represents norleucine) and ethylene glycol bis(succinimidyl succinate) consist of two isoelectric forms with cell type differences in both apparent size and charge (neutrophils: 55-70 kDa, pI 5.8, and 6.2.; monocytes: 60-75 kDa, pI 5.6 and 6.0; differentiated HL-60 cells: 62-85 kDa, pI 5.6 and 6.0). Endo-beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase F (endo F) cleavage of N-linked oligosaccharides from formyl peptide receptor generates 40-50- and 33-kDa products that can be affinity-labeled. Whereas both pI forms of this receptor from neutrophils are cleaved by endo F to 33-kDa final products, this cleavage does not eliminate pI differences. Tunicamycin decreases expression of formyl peptide receptor on differentiating HL-60 and causes a dose-dependent decrease in size of the major product seen after affinity labeling (0.5 micrograms/ml: 38-48 kDa; 2 micrograms/ml: 32 kDa). Thus, the formyl peptide receptor polypeptide backbone from all three cell types contains at least two N-linked oligosaccharide side chains which contribute to the cell type differences in Mr and are not required for ligand binding. Papain treatment of intact cells generates a membrane-bound formyl peptide receptor fragment that can be affinity-labeled and is of similar size (29-31 kDa) in all three cell types. Endo F treatment of the affinity-labeled papain fragment of formyl peptide receptor does not alter its size, suggesting that this fragment does not contain the N-linked oligosaccharide cleaved by endo F from intact receptor. The results indicate that at least two N-linked oligosaccharide chains are located on the distal 1-3-kDa portion of the receptor polypeptide backbone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malech et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: