Key result
Coronary revascularization outcomes have historically been worse in females compared with males, but recent trials show narrowed sex-based differences in cardiovascular outcomes.
Why the study?
Are there sex differences in clinical outcomes following surgical or percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with significant coronary heart disease?
Systematic Review
Are there sex differences in clinical outcomes following surgical or percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with significant coronary heart disease?
While early studies suggested worse outcomes for females after coronary revascularization, recent evidence indicates these sex-based differences have narrowed with the advent of newer techniques and devices.
Comparable revascularization outcomes now support sex-neutral decisions; confirms narrowing of historical disparities and extends evidence for equitable contemporary care.
There have been several reports suggesting that the response to treatment for patients with significant coronary heart disease was not equal among males and females. Most of the early investigations on sex differences after surgical or percutaneous coronary revascularization suggested worse clinical outcomes in females compared with male counterparts. However, along with the advent of new revascularization techniques and devices, recent trials have shown somewhat narrowed sex-based differences in cardiovascular outcomes. Given that sex-based difference in outcomes and prognosis is still an important ongoing issue, this article systematically reviewed the cumulative evidence from key clinical studies and tried to help guide the physician in making sex-specific treatment decisions for patients with significant coronary heart disease requiring coronary revascularization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2015) conducted a systematic review in significant coronary heart disease requiring coronary revascularization. coronary revascularization was evaluated on cardiovascular outcomes. Coronary revascularization outcomes have historically been worse in females compared with males, but recent trials show narrowed sex-based differences in cardiovascular outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: