Key result
In patients undergoing coronary angiography, male sex was associated with a higher unadjusted risk of heart failure rehospitalization (22.4% vs 20.3%; HR 1.127), which was lost after adjustment.
Why the study?
Sex-based differences in baseline characteristics and management of cardiovascular disease have been demonstrated, but their impact on long-term outcomes in unselected patients undergoing coronary angiography remains unknown.
Does male sex compared to female sex affect the risk of heart failure rehospitalization and coronary revascularization in unselected patients undergoing coronary angiography?
Cohort (n=7,691)
No
Does male sex compared to female sex affect the risk of heart failure rehospitalization and coronary revascularization in unselected patients undergoing coronary angiography?
Hazard Ratio: 1.127 (95% CI 1.014–1.254)
Absolute Event Rate: 22.4% vs 20.3%
p-value: p=0.027
In unselected patients undergoing coronary angiography, male sex is independently associated with a higher risk of subsequent coronary revascularization, but not heart failure rehospitalization, compared to females.
Male sex was associated with higher revascularization risk after angiography; leaves open whether sex-specific strategies warrant prospective testing.
Background: The study investigates sex-related differences and outcomes in unselected patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography (CA). Sex-based differences with regard to baseline characteristics and management of patients with cardiovascular disease have yet been demonstrated. However, their impact on long-term outcomes in unselected patients undergoing CA remains unknown. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing invasive CA from 2016 to 2022 were included at one institution. Prognosis of male and female patients undergoing CA was investigated with regard to the primary endpoint of rehospitalization for heart failure (HF) at 36 months. Secondary endpoints comprised the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and coronary revascularization at 36 months, as well as in-hospital all-cause mortality. Statistical analyses included Kaplan–Meier analyses, as well as uni- and multivariable Cox proportional regression analyses. Results: From 2016 to 2022, 7691 patients undergoing CA were included (males: 65.1%; females: 34.9%). Males had a higher prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) (76.2% vs. 57.4%; p = 0.001), alongside a higher prevalence of 3-vessel CAD compared to females (33.9% vs. 20.3%; p = 0.001). The risk of rehospitalization for HF at 36 months was higher in males compared to females (22.4% vs. 20.3%; p = 0.036; HR = 1.127; 95% CI: 1.014–1.254; p = 0.027), which was no longer observed after multivariable adjustment. Male sex was associated with a higher risk of coronary revascularization (9.6% vs. 5.9%; p = 0.001; HR = 1.659; 95% CI: 1.379–1.997; p = 0.001), which was still evident after multivariable adjustment (HR = 1.650; 95% CI 1.341–2.029; p = 0.001). However, neither the risk of AMI at 36 months (8.1% vs. 6.9%; p = 0.077), nor the risk of in-hospital all-cause mortality (6.9% vs. 6.5%; p = 0.689) differed significantly between the two sexes. Conclusions: In consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography, male sex was independently associated with an increased risk of coronary revascularization, but not HF-related rehospitalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schupp et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography (n=7,691). Male sex vs. Female sex was evaluated on Rehospitalization for heart failure (HF) at 36 months (HR 1.127, 95% CI 1.014-1.254, p=0.027). In patients undergoing coronary angiography, male sex was associated with a higher unadjusted risk of heart failure rehospitalization (22.4% vs 20.3%; HR 1.127), which was lost after adjustment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: