Why the study?
Does female gender affect the incidence of major adverse cardiac events in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing elective PCI?
Cohort (n=404)
No
Does female gender affect the incidence of major adverse cardiac events in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing elective PCI?
Despite worse baseline clinical profiles, long-term clinical outcomes after elective PCI do not significantly differ between women and men with diabetes mellitus.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No gender difference in long-term MACE after elective PCI in diabetes; leaves open confounding by baseline factors in observational data.
Diabetes mellitus has a greater effect on mortality rates due to coronary artery disease in women than in men. Although women undergoing coronary intervention in general have a higher frequency of adverse outcomes than men, the effect of gender among diabetic patients on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been well established in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era. We have investigated the impact of gender on long-term clinical outcome in these high risk populations. We enrolled 404 consecutive patients (74 women and 330 men) with diabetes mellitus who underwent elective PCI (85% with DES). We evaluated the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), which is a composite of total all-cause death, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) during a period of 4 years after coronary intervention. The women were significantly older, more likely to have dyslipidemia, and had significantly higher systolic blood pressure and LDL-C values than men. The use of insulin and angiotensin receptor blockers was more frequent among the women (32.4% versus 21.0%, P = 0.04 and 60.8% versus 39.8%, P < 0.01, respectively). The angiographic profiles of both were comparable. At four-year clinical follow-up, cumulative incidence of MACE was identical between the women and the men (16.2% versus 15.5%, P = 0.90; adjusted HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.61-2.50, P = 0.56). Although the baseline characteristics of the women were worse, clinical outcomes did not significantly differ between women and men among diabetic patients after elective PCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ogita et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in Diabetes mellitus undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (n=404). Female gender vs. Male gender was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (composite of all-cause death, acute coronary syndrome, and target lesion revascularization) (HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.61-2.50, p=0.56).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: