Key result
Novel designed αIIbβ3 antagonists 4c, 4d, and 12b demonstrated potent inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation with IC50 values of 6.2 nM, 25 nM, and 11 nM, outperforming Tirofiban (32 nM).
Novel designed αIIbβ3 antagonists demonstrated higher in vitro potency for inhibiting platelet aggregation compared to tirofiban.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May advance αIIbβ3 antagonist design; leaves open clinical efficacy and safety.
This article describes design, virtual screening, synthesis, and biological tests of novel αIIbβ3 antagonists, which inhibit platelet aggregation. Two types of αIIbβ3 antagonists were developed: those binding either closed or open form of the protein. At the first step, available experimental data were used to build QSAR models and ligand- and structure-based pharmacophore models and to select the most appropriate tool for ligand-to-protein docking. Virtual screening of publicly available databases (BioinfoDB, ZINC, Enamine data sets) with developed models resulted in no hits. Therefore, small focused libraries for two types of ligands were prepared on the basis of pharmacophore models. Their screening resulted in four potential ligands for open form of αIIbβ3 and four ligands for its closed form followed by their synthesis and in vitro tests. Experimental measurements of affinity for αIIbβ3 and ability to inhibit ADP-induced platelet aggregation (IC50) showed that two designed ligands for the open form 4c and 4d (IC50 = 6.2 nM and 25 nM, respectively) and one for the closed form 12b (IC50 = 11 nM) were more potent than commercial antithrombotic Tirofiban (IC50 = 32 nM).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Polishchuk et al. (2015) studied Platelet aggregation. Novel αIIbβ3 antagonists (ligands 4c, 4d, 12b) vs. Tirofiban was evaluated on Affinity for αIIbβ3 and ability to inhibit ADP-induced platelet aggregation (IC50). Novel designed αIIbβ3 antagonists 4c, 4d, and 12b demonstrated potent inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation with IC50 values of 6.2 nM, 25 nM, and 11 nM, outperforming Tirofiban (32 nM).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: