Key result
ARNI significantly reduced the risk of progression from paroxysmal to persistent atrial fibrillation compared to ARB (HR 0.32).
Why the study?
Progression from paroxysmal to persistent AF is linked to adverse clinical outcomes, but whether ARNI can delay AF progression was unclear.
Does sacubitril/valsartan reduce the risk of progression from paroxysmal to persistent atrial fibrillation compared to ARB in patients with paroxysmal AF?
Cohort (n=170)
No
Does sacubitril/valsartan reduce the risk of progression from paroxysmal to persistent atrial fibrillation compared to ARB in patients with paroxysmal AF?
In patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, treatment with sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduced the risk of progression to persistent AF compared to ARB therapy.
May support ARNI over ARB to slow paroxysmal AF progression; leaves open need for randomized confirmation before practice change.
Progression from paroxysmal to persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is linked to adverse clinical outcomes. The present study sought to clarify whether angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) can delay AF progression. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF admitted at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University between January 2017 and January 2022. The risk of AF progression from paroxysmal to persistent was compared between paroxysmal patients treated with ARNI and those who received an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). Seven-day Holter monitoring was performed to identify persistent AF. Propensity-score matched analysis was performed to compare the two groups. Cox-regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for AF progression events. A total of 1083 patients were screened, and 113 patients in the ARB group and 57 patients in the ARNI group were eligible for analysis. Before propensity-score matching, the ARNI therapy was associated with a lower risk of AF progression than the ARB therapy (HR 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14-0.81; P = 0.015) after a median follow-up of 705 (interquartile range [IQR] 512 to 895) days. Among 170 patients, 47 ARNI-treated patients were successfully matched to 47 ARB-treated patients. After a median follow-up of 724 (541-929) days, compared to ARB, ARNI significantly reduced the risk of AF progression (HR 0.32; 95% CI 0.12-0.88; P = 0.016). ARNI may be superior to ARB in reducing the risk of progression from paroxysmal to persistent AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=170). Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) vs. Angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) was evaluated on Progression from paroxysmal to persistent atrial fibrillation (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.12-0.88, p=0.016). ARNI significantly reduced the risk of progression from paroxysmal to persistent atrial fibrillation compared to ARB (HR 0.32).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: