Key result
Switching to ARNI linked to ~11% lower risk of new-onset AF vs. traditional RAS blockade.
Why the study?
It was uncertain whether switching from traditional RAS blockade to ARNI reduces the risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation in HFrEF patients without prior AF.
Does switching to ARNI reduce new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with HFrEF without prior AF compared to continuing traditional RAS blockade?
Cohort (n=39,061)
Yes
Does switching to ARNI reduce new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with HFrEF without prior AF compared to continuing traditional RAS blockade?
Switching to an ARNI from traditional RAS blockade in HFrEF patients without prior AF is associated with a significantly lower risk of new-onset AF within 1 year.
Should not yet change RAS inhibitor choice in HFrEF; hypothesis-generating pending randomized confirmation.
AIMS: We investigated whether switching from traditional renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade to angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) is associated with a lower risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) than continuing RAS blockade in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) without prior AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service (2017-2021), we identified 39,061 patients with HFrEF without prior AF who received either ARNI (n = 12,263) or traditional RAS blockade (n = 26,798). After 1:1 propensity score matching, 9,030 patients were included in each group. The primary outcome was new-onset AF within 1 year. In the propensity score-matched cohort, new-onset AF incidence was lower in the ARNI group (10.73 vs. 12.15 per 100 person-years; hazard ratio [HR] 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81-0.98; P = 0.021). The composite outcome (new-onset AF, ischaemic stroke, or all-cause death) was also reduced (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.79-0.92; P < 0.001). In competing risk analysis, ARNI was associated with a lower subdistribution hazard of new-onset AF (sHR 0.73; 95% CI 0.58-0.91; P = 0.005). In the unmatched cohort, the HR was 0.85 (95% CI 0.75-0.96) in an exploratory model including age, sex, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, prior ischaemic stroke, socioeconomic status, residential region, and beta-blocker use, and 0.94 (95% CI 0.87-1.02) after adjustment for all measured baseline covariates. CONCLUSION: In this large nationwide cohort of AF-naïve patients with HFrEF, switching to ARNI was associated with a lower risk of short-term new-onset AF than continuing traditional RAS blockade. As this was a retrospective study, further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) without prior atrial fibrillation (n=39,061). Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) vs. Traditional renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade was evaluated on New-onset atrial fibrillation within 1 year (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.98, p=0.021). Switching to ARNI was associated with a lower risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation compared to continuing traditional RAS blockade (HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.81-0.98; P=0.021).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: